In trying to write this blog in English I hope finally able to start jabber a few words in this language. I will mobilise various tools for that my text be in accordance with the rules of grammar and spelling. Thanks for your corrections and comments.

Monday, September 14, 2009

New friendly microscopic entities

50 comments:

krn said...

Oh, my favorite is...
hum, I let you imagine which of these new friendly microscopic entities is the one I prefer.

patton said...

HIV ! you forget HIV ! " comme un oursin " .

krn said...

HIV is not a friendly microscopic entity.
It means Horribilis Ignominiatus Velox. Is it a friend of yours ?

krn said...

More seriously, the HIV is a harmless retrovirus the utility of which we do not know.

Marilyn said...

Mis favoritas son la 3ra y la 8va... saludos! ¿has vuelto a tu incursión bloggera?

krn said...

Aaarrgh ! my favorite has vanished !

Momo said...

krn, in that case it seems to me that it was the nineth your favorite. Would you like that I put it back ?

Marilyn, welcome back :-)
Yes, I'll try to continue.

Patton, you forget the pig flu.

krn said...

I do not know if it was the ninth.
It was a little squared, blue, with some lace all around.

No, you are not obliged to put it back there, but I would be happy if you made me a present by sending it to me.

Momo said...

Wish granted, krn.

And you convinced me to put it back, accompanied with two others.

doreus said...

Friendly and beautiful...

As for HIV, I really don't see how it can be seen as a "harmless retrovirus"... Could you explain? It certainly has not been without consequences for my boyfriend's life...

krn said...

Doréus,
I shall believe in the responsibility of the HIV in a some disease when a cause and effect relationship will have scientifically been established.

Today, there is absolutely no proofs concerning the links beetween HIV and AIDS.

Luc Montagnier, who would have discovered the virus, asserts himself that it is impossible that this virus is the cause of the AIDS, what is confirmed by Robert Root-Bernstein.

There are on the other hand numerous proofs that the AZT is harmful.

krn said...

Momo, I like very much you friendly microscopic entities.

...and Léandra too.

patton said...

This is not the proof that HIV is harmless . even it would not be the single cause ?

krn said...

Don't you think that if it wasn't harmless it would be involved in a sure way in at least one disease ?

To find it, the researchers had to put it in culture. Only God knows where it came from, because if there is sometimes AIDS without HIV, there is also HIV without AIDS.

We had a friend, a sailor, who knew more about this. Let's ask him.

patton said...

I don't understand the meaning of your first sentence ? harmless or not ?

krn said...

I say that if it was harmful, it would be involved in a sure way in at least one disease.

patton said...

Ok , no link established between HIV and AID . May be ? I have not any knowledge about that . So , once again , that's bullshits ?

patton said...

from whom ?

patton said...

So , HIV is really friendly ? et nous sommes tous pris pour des cons naïfs et mal informés ???

patton said...

That's possible . I agree ....But...

krn said...

We live in a society of lies and profits. It is impossible to trust the authorities and the media.

The medicine became the new religion with its methods of the inquisition.

Laboratories do not try to cure people, they try to turn the diseases into chronic ones to ensure the continued existence of their earnings.

I am very afraid of medicine. Even I have a serious disease, I'd prefer hide myself than eat their poisons.

patton said...

" Eyes wide shut " , Momo knows this movie , for sure . Let's go back to " friendly microscopic entities ". Tout ce qui est petit est gentil .

krn said...

I can't understand the parallel between the scenario of this film and the subject about what we have just spoken, but you are doubtless going to enlighten me.

patton said...

Do you know the subject-scenario ? Have you seen this movie ? Ask to Momo , I'm sure he saw it .

patton said...

Great Secret , World wide conspiracy , paranoïa .

krn said...

Open your eyes and your ears, Patton.
All is said clearly.

patton said...

Have you seen this movie ? Yes or No ?

patton said...

N'esquive pas .

krn said...

I had left to fetch belts at a supplier.
I am working. I had no time to have lunch and this film is not even the slightest of my concerns.

Yes, I saw it and I really think that it was a waste of time.
I count the films which I liked on the fingers of a single hand.
For me Kubrick is mad, and Tom Cruise and Nicole Kidman are exhibitionists without charisma.
The novel where from is pulled this ultra-trite conjugal story could have been better treated with strangers and less flashy scenes.
Are you satisfied ?

Momo said...

Patton, krn isn't a film buff.

Of course, I know this film, I know almost all the Kubriks' films.

Momo said...

Ho ! krn, do you really seen this film ?

krn said...

Yes, I saw it with my husband who is a fan of Tom Cruise.
I also saw Top gun, The color of money, Born on the fourth of July, A few good men, The firm and Rain man.

The only one I really liked is Rain man, Dustin Hoffman's performance in this movie is the best acting performance I have ever seen.

krn said...

I forgot it in my profil.

krn said...

It is not because I do not like particularly the atmosphere of the cinemas that I am closed in this kind of expression.

What I can assert on the other hand, it is that I hate the unrealistic special effects and the effusions of haemoglobin so useless as disproportionate.

I like the human films which speak about true things and the actors who enter the role of their character and make us forget who they are.

krn said...

I could quote Pedro Almodovar's movie "High Heels" in which Victoria Abril was very convincing.
I cannot speak about this movie without saying that I especially admired Miguel Bose's magnificent performance as well in its "feminine" role as in its judge's role.

Momo said...
This comment has been removed by the author.
Momo said...

My dear krn,

You must not to have shame because you are not a film buff.

We cannot to know everything, we cannot to love everything. We must do our own choose.

krn said...

Dear Momo, I absolutely don't feel ashamed. I am very well.
How are you ?

Momo said...

I feel like when there is the new moon, a little bit paranoiac, melancolic and stupid.

krn said...

I think the full moon is worse than the new moon.

Momo said...

I think sometimes the full moon is worse, and sometimes the new moon is worse. It's never the same thing.

krn said...

Would there be another cause besides the moon ?

Momo said...

Please clarify the question.

Momo said...

I'll go to the bed now.

Good night, krn.

krn said...

Have sweet dreams, Momo.

patton said...

The moon was friendly . Incredible!.... This moon is definitely versatile.

Momo said...

You are absolutely right, Patton. This new moon was versatile.

Anonymous said...

Hello my very dear, here is the blog of the person I told you many times, do you remember?
http://blaise-galland.over-blog.com/

Kisses y cariños

Anahy

Anonymous said...

May be you can specially see this page, about "paysages sattelitaires":
http://blaise-galland.over-blog.com/article-29508577.html

Anahy

Momo said...

Thank you, Anahy, I'll go see it.