In trying to write this blog in English I hope finally able to start jabber a few words in this language. I will mobilise various tools for that my text be in accordance with the rules of grammar and spelling. Thanks for your corrections and comments.
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
50 comments:
Oh, my favorite is...
hum, I let you imagine which of these new friendly microscopic entities is the one I prefer.
HIV ! you forget HIV ! " comme un oursin " .
HIV is not a friendly microscopic entity.
It means Horribilis Ignominiatus Velox. Is it a friend of yours ?
More seriously, the HIV is a harmless retrovirus the utility of which we do not know.
Mis favoritas son la 3ra y la 8va... saludos! ¿has vuelto a tu incursión bloggera?
Aaarrgh ! my favorite has vanished !
krn, in that case it seems to me that it was the nineth your favorite. Would you like that I put it back ?
Marilyn, welcome back :-)
Yes, I'll try to continue.
Patton, you forget the pig flu.
I do not know if it was the ninth.
It was a little squared, blue, with some lace all around.
No, you are not obliged to put it back there, but I would be happy if you made me a present by sending it to me.
Wish granted, krn.
And you convinced me to put it back, accompanied with two others.
Friendly and beautiful...
As for HIV, I really don't see how it can be seen as a "harmless retrovirus"... Could you explain? It certainly has not been without consequences for my boyfriend's life...
Doréus,
I shall believe in the responsibility of the HIV in a some disease when a cause and effect relationship will have scientifically been established.
Today, there is absolutely no proofs concerning the links beetween HIV and AIDS.
Luc Montagnier, who would have discovered the virus, asserts himself that it is impossible that this virus is the cause of the AIDS, what is confirmed by Robert Root-Bernstein.
There are on the other hand numerous proofs that the AZT is harmful.
Momo, I like very much you friendly microscopic entities.
...and Léandra too.
This is not the proof that HIV is harmless . even it would not be the single cause ?
Don't you think that if it wasn't harmless it would be involved in a sure way in at least one disease ?
To find it, the researchers had to put it in culture. Only God knows where it came from, because if there is sometimes AIDS without HIV, there is also HIV without AIDS.
We had a friend, a sailor, who knew more about this. Let's ask him.
I don't understand the meaning of your first sentence ? harmless or not ?
I say that if it was harmful, it would be involved in a sure way in at least one disease.
Ok , no link established between HIV and AID . May be ? I have not any knowledge about that . So , once again , that's bullshits ?
from whom ?
So , HIV is really friendly ? et nous sommes tous pris pour des cons naïfs et mal informés ???
That's possible . I agree ....But...
We live in a society of lies and profits. It is impossible to trust the authorities and the media.
The medicine became the new religion with its methods of the inquisition.
Laboratories do not try to cure people, they try to turn the diseases into chronic ones to ensure the continued existence of their earnings.
I am very afraid of medicine. Even I have a serious disease, I'd prefer hide myself than eat their poisons.
" Eyes wide shut " , Momo knows this movie , for sure . Let's go back to " friendly microscopic entities ". Tout ce qui est petit est gentil .
I can't understand the parallel between the scenario of this film and the subject about what we have just spoken, but you are doubtless going to enlighten me.
Do you know the subject-scenario ? Have you seen this movie ? Ask to Momo , I'm sure he saw it .
Great Secret , World wide conspiracy , paranoïa .
Open your eyes and your ears, Patton.
All is said clearly.
Have you seen this movie ? Yes or No ?
N'esquive pas .
I had left to fetch belts at a supplier.
I am working. I had no time to have lunch and this film is not even the slightest of my concerns.
Yes, I saw it and I really think that it was a waste of time.
I count the films which I liked on the fingers of a single hand.
For me Kubrick is mad, and Tom Cruise and Nicole Kidman are exhibitionists without charisma.
The novel where from is pulled this ultra-trite conjugal story could have been better treated with strangers and less flashy scenes.
Are you satisfied ?
Patton, krn isn't a film buff.
Of course, I know this film, I know almost all the Kubriks' films.
Ho ! krn, do you really seen this film ?
Yes, I saw it with my husband who is a fan of Tom Cruise.
I also saw Top gun, The color of money, Born on the fourth of July, A few good men, The firm and Rain man.
The only one I really liked is Rain man, Dustin Hoffman's performance in this movie is the best acting performance I have ever seen.
I forgot it in my profil.
It is not because I do not like particularly the atmosphere of the cinemas that I am closed in this kind of expression.
What I can assert on the other hand, it is that I hate the unrealistic special effects and the effusions of haemoglobin so useless as disproportionate.
I like the human films which speak about true things and the actors who enter the role of their character and make us forget who they are.
I could quote Pedro Almodovar's movie "High Heels" in which Victoria Abril was very convincing.
I cannot speak about this movie without saying that I especially admired Miguel Bose's magnificent performance as well in its "feminine" role as in its judge's role.
My dear krn,
You must not to have shame because you are not a film buff.
We cannot to know everything, we cannot to love everything. We must do our own choose.
Dear Momo, I absolutely don't feel ashamed. I am very well.
How are you ?
I feel like when there is the new moon, a little bit paranoiac, melancolic and stupid.
I think the full moon is worse than the new moon.
I think sometimes the full moon is worse, and sometimes the new moon is worse. It's never the same thing.
Would there be another cause besides the moon ?
Please clarify the question.
I'll go to the bed now.
Good night, krn.
Have sweet dreams, Momo.
The moon was friendly . Incredible!.... This moon is definitely versatile.
You are absolutely right, Patton. This new moon was versatile.
Hello my very dear, here is the blog of the person I told you many times, do you remember?
http://blaise-galland.over-blog.com/
Kisses y cariños
Anahy
May be you can specially see this page, about "paysages sattelitaires":
http://blaise-galland.over-blog.com/article-29508577.html
Anahy
Thank you, Anahy, I'll go see it.
Post a Comment